Campaign 1996

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Bob Mulligan APRIL 15, 1996 (202) 223-2942 STUDY FINDS MORE BITE THAN MEAT IN TV ELECTION NEWS NETWORKS TRASH THE CAMPAIGN, MUFF THE HORSE RACE CALL WHO’S THE MOST CYNICAL OF THEM ALL? Television coverage of the 1996 presidential race has too much bite and not enough meat, according to a

FIRST “REPORT CARD” FOR “MARKLE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WATCH” REVEALS MEDIA DISTORTIONS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE GOP PRIMARY COVERAGE Media distortions are making the GOP presidential primaries seem more negative and less substantive than they really are, according to a new study by the Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA). The researchers used a scientific content

FIRST “REPORT CARD” FOR “MARKLE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WATCH” REVEALS MEDIA DISTORTIONS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE GOP PRIMARY COVERAGE Media distortions are making the GOP presidential primaries seem more negative and less substantive than they really are, according to a new study by the Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA). The researchers used a scientific content

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 21, 1996 CONTACT: Bob Mulligan TV TALKED TOUGH BUT SHOWED FLUFF IN NEW HAMPSHIRE Study Finds Much Criticism but Little Substance in Campaign News TV news came down hard on the candidates but went easy on the substance during the New Hampshire race, according to a new study by the Center

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 16, 1996 CONTACT: Bob Mulligan TV NEWS RAPS FORBES, RIPS GOP CAMPAIGN Study Finds Media Love the Horse Race, Hate the Way It’s Run TV news coverage of the Iowa contest was 2 to 1 negative toward Steve Forbes but 2 to 1 positive toward the other GOP candidates, according to